Cases 51 - 60 of 75
Anderson et al v. Bentley et al
as 1:2012cv00473
Plaintiff:
Michael Dewayne Anderson, Otis Brown and Ronald Harris
Defendant:
Robert Bentley, Callie T. Dietz and Charlie Graddick
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv00458
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1334
Nelson et al v. Mayfield et al
as 7:2012cv01965
Plaintiff:
Mary Nelson and Otis Nelson
Defendant:
J Drew Mayfield , Nationwide Property and Casualty Insurance Company , GBS Roofing and Restoration, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Nelson et al v. Mayfield et al
as 7:2012cv01951
Plaintiff:
Mary Nelson and Otis Nelson
Defendant:
J Drew Mayfield, Nationwide Property and Casualty Insurance Company, GBS Roofing and Restoration, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Al-Ameen v. Brown
as 4:2012cv01747
Plaintiff:
Muhammad Al-Ameen
Defendant:
Otis Brown
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney 1
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Otis Elevator Company v. WG Yates & Sons Construction Company
as 5:2012cv01708
Plaintiff:
Otis Elevator Company
Defendant:
WG Yates & Sons Construction Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2011cv01093
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Harris v. Davenport et al
as 2:2010cv02844
Petitioner:
James Otis Harris
Respondent:
Davenport, State of Alabama and Attorney General of the State of Alabama, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2010cv00142
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family and Medical Leave Act (1993)
Bowers v. Jones et al
as 2:2009cv01133
Petitioner:
Otis Lee Bowers
Respondent:
Kenneth Jones and Attorney General of the State of Alabama, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
