Cases 51 - 60 of 77
Owens v. Commonwealth of Massaschusetts et al
as 1:2011cv10883
Petitioner:
Julius Owens
Respondent:
Commonwealth of Massaschusetts and Robert Murphy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Gaskins v. Dickhaut et al
as 1:2011cv10782
Plaintiff:
Tony B. Gaskins
Defendant:
Thomas Dickhaut and Amy Owens
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Metropolitan Life Insurance Company v. Owen et al
as 1:2011cv10560
Plaintiff:
Metropolitan Life Insurance Company
Defendant:
Kathleen May Owen and Beth Charnley Phillips
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Norcross v. City of Methuen et al
as 1:2011cv10154
Plaintiff:
Owen Norcross
Defendant:
City of Methuen , Trombly Motor Coach Service, Inc. , Robert Jalbert and others
Cross_claimant:
Trombly Motor Coach Service, Inc. and City of Methuen
Cross_defendant:
City of Methuen and Trombly Motor Coach Service, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1400
Watson v. Owens et al
as 1:2011cv10095
Plaintiff:
Lawrence Watson
Defendant:
Anthony Owens, Unknown Clerk, Stephen Neel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Chudnofsky v. Premium Retail, L.P. et al
as 1:2010cv11421
Plaintiff:
Carl Chudnofsky
Defendant:
Premium Retail, L.P. , Lee Outlets, LLC , Prime Outlets Acquisition Company, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Rasheed v. D'Antonio et al
as 1:2010cv11253
Plaintiff:
Rashad Rasheed
Defendant:
Angela D'Antonio, Marlene Dodge, Dyana Nicki and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rivas v. Dickhaut et al
as 1:2010cv11112
Plaintiff:
Francisco Rivas
Defendant:
Thomas Dickhaut, Anthony Mendonsa, Osvaldo Vidal and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Klein v. Owen
as 1:2009cv11528
Plaintiff:
Viktor Rolf Klein
Defendant:
Amy Owen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Small v. Layne Christensen Company et al
as 1:2009cv11167
Plaintiff:
Edward Small
Defendant:
Layne Christensen Company, Solmetex, Inc., Owen Boyd and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 6901 Environmental Cleanup Expenses
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
