Cases
Cases 51 - 60 of 194
HICKS v. WETZEL et al
as 2:2021cv04719
Plaintiff: CHARLES HICKS
Defendant: JOHN E. WETZEL and PA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
STOLLAR v. WETZEL et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2021cv01515
Plaintiff: PATRICK STOLLAR
Defendant: JOHN E. WETZEL and PA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Heinbach v. Pennsylvania Board of Probation & Parole et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2021cv01858
Plaintiff: Walter M. Heinbach
Defendant: Pennsylvania Board of Probation & Parole, Superintendent Kevin Ransom, Secretary John K. Wetzel, Secretary of the PA D.O.C. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
RIVERA v. WETZEL et al
as 2:2021cv04524
Plaintiff: CLETUS RIVERA
Defendant: JOHN E. WETZEL and PA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MURPHY v. WETZEL et al
as 2:2021cv04436
Plaintiff: CRAIG MURPHY
Defendant: JOHN E. WETZEL and PA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
THOMAS v. WETZEL et al
as 2:2021cv04469
Plaintiff: DONTE L. THOMAS
Defendant: JOHN E. WETZEL and PA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CHATHAM v. UPMC PRESBYTERIAN HOSPITAL et al
as 3:2021cv00173
Plaintiff: NIKOLA CHATHAM
Defendant: UPMC PRESBYTERIAN HOSPITAL, UPMC ALTOONA HOSPITAL, SCI HOUTZDALE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BOXLEY v. WETZEL et al
as 2:2021cv04468
Plaintiff: RICHARD BOXLEY
Defendant: JOHN E. WETZEL and PA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PADILLA v. WETZEL et al
as 2:2021cv01572
Plaintiff: MIGUEL PADILLA
Defendant: JOHN E. WETZEL and PA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
KENYON v. PA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 3:2021cv00168
Plaintiff: TODD M KENYON
Defendant: PA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, JUDGE GREGORY GEARY and JUDGE T. LIVINGOOD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?