Cases 51 - 59 of 59
Ramos v. Holt et al
as 4:2010cv00681
Petitioner:
Pedro Ramos
Respondent:
Ronnie Holt and Northeast Regional Office
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Pedro Ramos, et al v. Fritz Newman, et al
as 09-56981
Plaintiff - Appellant:
PEDRO RAMOS, as an individual and as Guardian Ad Litem for K.R., minor, CATALINA RAMOS, as an individual and as Guardian Ad Litem for K.R., minor and THE FAIR HOUSING COUNSEL OF SAN DIEGO, INC.
Defendant - Appellee:
FRITZ NEWMAN, DBA El Camino 76 Mobile Estates, G. N. SELLERS, III, DBA N.A.P. Consulting Inc. and ADELE TEAL
Ramos v. Astrue
as 2:2009cv00392
Plaintiff:
Pedro Ramos, Jr
Defendant:
Michael J Astrue and Michael J Astrue
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv02068
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Ramos v. City of Chicago et al
as 1:2009cv01058
Plaintiff:
Pedro Ramos
Defendant:
City of Chicago, Stanley, Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Ramos v. Howard Johnson Plaza Dezerland Beach & Spa
as 1:2008cv23161
Plaintiff:
Pedro Ramos and Pedro Ramos
Defendant:
Howard Johnson Plaza Dezerland Beach & Spa
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Ramos et al v. Newman et al
as 3:2008cv00026
Plaintiff:
Pedro Ramos, Catalina B. Ramos and The Fair Housing Counsel of San Diego, Inc.
Defendant:
Fritz Newman, G. N. Sellers, III and Adele Teal
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Fair Housing Act
Ramos v. Chertoff et al
as 1:2007cv00858
Petitioner:
Pedro Ramos
Respondent:
Michael Chertoff, William Cleary, Michael B. Mukasey and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Rivas v. Dinwiddie
as 4:2007cv00152
Petitioner:
Pedro Ramos Rivas
Respondent:
Walter Dinwiddie
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
