Cases 51 - 60 of 274
Castaneira v. Arnold et al
as 5:2017cv00139
Plaintiff:
Andrew W. Castaneira
Defendant:
S. Andrew Arnold, Matthew Yanni, Berkeley County Prosecuting Attorney's Office and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Barcus et al v. Austin et al
as 1:2017cv00122
Plaintiff:
Joseph C. Barcus , James D. Shackleford and Peter L. Shipp
Defendant:
Terry Austin and Taylor County Commission
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Peters v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2017cv03451
Plaintiff:
Jodi Peters
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Saffell et al v. American Medical Systems, Inc. et al
as 2:2017cv03336
Plaintiff:
Irma Saffell , Carla Pineda , Terri Lee Strawn and others
Defendant:
American Medical Systems, Inc. , American Medical Systems, LLC , Astora Women's Health LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Peters v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2017cv03225
Plaintiff:
Carlena Peters
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Peters v. Boston Scientific Corporation
as 2:2017cv02970
Plaintiff:
Janet Peters
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Peters v. Williamson
as 3:2017cv00052
Petitioner:
Richard Wayne Peters
Respondent:
Mark Williamson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Peters v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2017cv02476
Plaintiff:
Joy MacConnell Peters
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Pritts et al v. New Creek Wind, LLC et al
as 2:2017cv00035
Plaintiff:
Peter L. Pritts and Lorna M. Pritts
Defendant:
New Creek Wind, LLC, Everpower Wind Holdings, Inc. and Enbridge Holdings, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Cavaliere et al v. Boston Scientific Corporation et al
as 2:2017cv01419
Plaintiff:
Sandra Cavaliere and Peter Cavaliere
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation and C. R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
