Cases 51 - 60 of 88
Genaville LLC v. Ralph Lauren Corporation
as 5:2015cv00089
Plaintiff:
Genaville LLC
Defendant:
Ralph Lauren Corporation
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Romero et al v. Macy's Inc. et al
as 3:2015cv00815
Plaintiff:
Jesus Romero , Marcos Romero , Perla Romero and others
Defendant:
Macy's Inc. , Ralph Lauren Corporation and Does 1 through 50
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Sarvint Technologies, Inc. v. Ralph Lauren Corporation
as 1:2015cv00071
Plaintiff:
Sarvint Technologies, Inc.
Defendant:
Ralph Lauren Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338
Converse Inc. v. Ralph Lauren Corporation
as 1:2014cv05980
Plaintiff:
Converse Inc.
Defendant:
Ralph Lauren Corporation
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051 Trademark Infringement
Indigo Group USA, Inc. v. Ralph Lauren Corporation
as 14-56429
Plaintiff - Appellant:
INDIGO GROUP USA, INC., a California corporation
Defendant - Appellee:
RALPH LAUREN CORPORATION, a Delaware corporation
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv05098
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Indigo Group USA, Inc. v. Ralph Lauren Corporation
as 2:2014cv04657
Plaintiff:
Indigo Group USA, Inc.
Defendant:
Ralph Lauren Corporation
State of Delaware et al v. Card Compliant LLC et al
as 1:2014cv00688
Plaintiff:
State of Delaware and William Sean French
Defendant:
Card Compliant LLC , Apple American Group LLC , Homeaway.com Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
The Indigo Group USA, Inc. v. Polo Ralph Lauren Corporation
as 14-55579
Plaintiff-counter-defendant - Appellant:
INDIGO GROUP USA, INC., a California corporation, The
Defendant-counter-claimant - Appellee:
POLO RALPH LAUREN CORPORATION, a Delaware corporation
eDekka LLC v. Ralph Lauren Corporation
as 2:2014cv00121
Plaintiff:
eDekka LLC
Defendant:
Ralph Lauren Corporation
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
