Cases
Cases 51 - 60 of 93
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv03442
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
USA v. Abbas Kareem
as 13-12040
Plaintiff - Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant: ABBAS RAUF KAREEM
Rauf v. PNC Bank et al
as 1:2013cv00706
Plaintiff: Tahisha Rauf
Defendant: PNC Bank, PNC Mortgage, McCurdy & Candler and others
Salem et al v. American Medical Systems, Inc. et al
as 2:2012cv06458
Plaintiff: Carolyn Louise Salem and Rauf Salem
Defendant: American Medical Systems, Inc., American Medical Systems Holdings, Inc., Endo Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
USA v. Rauf
as 5:2012mc00271
Petitioner: USA
Respondent: Naseem M. Rauf
Abdul-Rauf v. The Bank of New York Melton et al
as 1:2012cv01071
Plaintiff: Mahmoud Abdul-Rauf
Defendant: The Bank of New York Melton , Ocwen Loan Servicing, LLC. and McCalla Raymer, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1444
FORRAS et al v. RAUF et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2012cv00282
Plaintiff: VINCENT FORRAS and LARRY KLAYMAN
Defendant: IMAM FEISAL ABDUL RAUF and ADAM LEITMAN BAILEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Libel,Assault,Slander
Rauf Diwan v. EMP Global, L.L.C., et al
as 12-7007
Plaintiff - Appellant: Rauf Diwan
Defendant - Appellee: EMP Global, L.L.C., EMP Global Administration, L.L.C. and Emerging Markets Partnership VI, L.L.C.
Rauf Bajaria PLLC v. Wells Fargo Bank NA
as 3:2011cv03298
Plaintiff: Rauf Bajaria PLLC
Defendant: Wells Fargo Bank NA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
DIWAN v. EMP GLOBAL, LLC et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2011cv02041
Plaintiff: RAUF DIWAN
Defendant: EMP GLOBAL, LLC , EMP GLOBAL ADMINISTRATION, LLC and EMERGING MARKETS PARTNERSHIP VI, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?