Cases 51 - 60 of 262
Jones (ID 86916) v. Bumguardner et al
as 5:2015cv03102
Plaintiff:
Jason Lee Jones
Defendant:
(fnu) Bumguardner, Sam Cline, Ray Roberts and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nelson v. Roberts et al
as 5:2015cv03083
Petitioner:
Jonathan S. Nelson
Respondent:
Ray Roberts, Kansas, State of and Derek Schmidt
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Requena (ID 48877) v. Roberts et al
as 5:2015cv03077
Petitioner:
Adrian M. Requena
Respondent:
Ray Roberts and Derek Schmidt
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Nelson v. Burris et al
as 5:2015cv03075
Plaintiff:
Jeffery Dale Nelson
Defendant:
Douglas Burris, Ray Roberts and Johnny Goddard
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Beauclair v. Roberts, et al
as 15-3046
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DANNY ELLIOTT BEAUCLAIR
Defendant - Appellee:
RAY ROBERTS, Secretary of Corrections, in his personal and official capacity, JAMES HEIMGARTNER, FNU COCHRAN and others
Boaz Legacy, LP v. Roberts
as 7:2015cv00041
Plaintiff:
Boaz Legacy, LP
Defendant:
Monty Ray Roberts
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Conley v. Pryor, et al
as 15-3031
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ANTHONY DEAN CONLEY
Defendant - Appellee:
REX PRYOR, Warden, Lansing Correctional Facility, in his official and individual capacity, KYLE DEERE, Associate Warden, Lansing Correctional Facility, in his official and individual capacity, JOE PANTANO, M-Unit Counselor, Lansing Correctional Facility, in his official and individual capacity and others
Dunlap (ID 108228) v. Livingood et al
as 5:2015cv03025
Plaintiff:
Marcus P. Dunlap
Defendant:
(fnu) Livingood, (fnu) McGuire, James Heimgartner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lee v. Roberts
as 5:2015cv03004
Plaintiff:
Milton Lee
Defendant:
Ray Roberts
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bell v. State of Kansas, The et al
as 5:2014cv04117
Plaintiff:
Aubrey Bell
Defendant:
State of Kansas, The, Kansas Department of Corrections, Ray Roberts and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1402
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
