Cases 51 - 60 of 63
Reece v. Sumner County, Tennessee et al
as 3:2009cv01049
Petitioner:
James Richardson Reece
Respondent:
Sumner County, Tennessee, James Hunter, C.L. "Buck" Rodgers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Reece v. Little et al
as 3:2009cv01032
Plaintiff:
Kevin J. Reece
Defendant:
Cpl Howard
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Reece v. Little et al
as 2:2009cv00237
Plaintiff:
Kevin J Reece
Defendant:
George M Little, Tennessee Department of Correction, Charles Bass Correctional Complex and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Erwin v. Carlton et al
as 2:2009cv00182
Plaintiff:
Eddie Erwin
Defendant:
Howard Carlton, Fred Ramsey, Donald Henson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Oxentine v. Reece et al
as 2:2009cv00155
Plaintiff:
William M Oxentine
Defendant:
Mike Reece and Johnson County Mayor
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Clark v. Parker et al
as 1:2009cv00192
Plaintiff:
Charles A. Clark
Defendant:
Tony Parker, (f/n/u) Williams, Samantha Phillips and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Clark v. Parker et al
as 1:2009cv01152
Plaintiff:
Charles A. Clark
Defendant:
Stephen Dotson, Stephen Dotson, Lyle Reece-Gardner and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Southern Electrical Retirement Fund v. Reece Electric, Inc.
as 3:2009cv00209
Plaintiff:
Southern Electrical Retirement Fund
Defendant:
Reece Electric, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Reece v. Astrue et al
as 1:2008cv01123
Plaintiff:
Charlene W. Reece
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue, David Kustoff and Michael Mukasey
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Simpson v. Reece et al
as 2:2008cv00070
Plaintiff:
James B Simpson
Defendant:
Mike Reece and Johnson County Jail
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
