Cases 51 - 60 of 130
Giles v. Cunningham et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2017cv00647
Plaintiff:
Samuel Giles
Defendant:
Derrick Cunningham, Major Robinson, Lt. Alexander and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Reed v. Rodgers et al
as 4:2017cv01625
Plaintiff:
Rodney Allen Reed
Defendant:
Lieutenant Rodgers, Correctional Officer Johnson, Correctional Officer Thompkins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brown et al v. MDFI Inc et al
as 7:2017mc01618
Plaintiff:
David Brown , Dayletta Chaney , Rachel Chaney and others
Defendant:
MDFI Inc , Samuel J. Hamilton at York, LLC and Mar-Jac Poultry Inc
Miscellaneou:
Bankruptcy Clerk and Jennifer H Henderson
Oliver v. Bolling et al
as 2:2017cv01294
Plaintiff:
Michael Darnell Oliver
Defendant:
Leon Bolling, Angela Miree, Errol Pickens and others
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv00203
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
King v. Warrior, The City of et al
as 2:2017cv00174
Plaintiff:
Trinell King
Defendant:
Warrior, The City of , Ricky Pridmore , Corey Archer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hayden v. Graffeo et al
as 2:2017cv00038
Plaintiff:
Steven Mark Hayden
Defendant:
Michael G Graffeo , Mike Hale , Raymond Rodgers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Doe 1 et al v. Foxx Tails et al
as 5:2016cv01477
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe 1 and Jane Doe 2
Defendant:
Foxx Tails and Gail Rodgers
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Nye v. Riley et al
as 4:2016cv00806
Plaintiff:
James Donald Nye
Defendant:
Tim Riley, Markita Shaw, Romona Rodgers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. City of Birmingham et al
as 2:2016cv00650
Plaintiff:
Aubrey Williams
Defendant:
City of Birmingham, Daniel Aguirre, Richard Haluska and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
