Cases 51 - 60 of 142
John Pokras v. J. Lewis, et al
as 18-55695
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOHN R. POKRAS
Defendant - Appellee:
J. LEWIS and S. MORRIS
Moody v. Williams et al
as 3:2018cv00661
Plaintiff:
Jesse E. Moody, Jr.
Defendant:
Mike Williams, Mike Bruno, T. S. Morris and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jonathan S. Morris, P.A. et al v. Chamber Approved, Inc. et al
as 0:2018cv61105
Plaintiff:
Jonathan S. Morris, P.A. and Broward Psychology, P.A.
Defendant:
Chamber Approved, Inc. , Broward County Chamber of Commerce, Inc. , Miami-Dade County Chamber of Commerce, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Morris et al v. Sanofi US Services Inc. et al
as 2:2018cv04472
Plaintiff:
Sheila S Morris and Philip M Morris
Defendant:
Sanofi-Aventis U.S. LLC and Sanofi US Services Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Bruce Allen v. Scott Kernan et al
as 2:2018cv02586
Plaintiff:
Bruce Allen
Defendant:
Debbie Asuncion, A. M. Chen, A. M. Chen and others
Cory Micenheimer v. P. Finander, et al
as 18-55219
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CORY DEWAYNE MICENHEIMER
Defendant - Appellee:
P. FINANDER, Chief Medical Executive individual, S. MORRIS, Chief Physician and Surgeon, individual, P. SHANK, Chief Executive Officer, Health Care, individual and others
Qualls #134601 v. Ryan et al
as 2:2017cv03887
Plaintiff:
Gary R Qualls
Defendant:
Charles L Ryan, Michael Linderman, Unknown O'Marro and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Montgomery #301029 v. Morris et al
as 2:2017cv03579
Petitioner:
Curtis Montgomery
Respondent:
S Morris and Attorney General of the State of Arizona
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
John Pokras v. J Lewis et al
as 2:2017cv06603
Defendant:
J Lewis and S. Morris
Plaintiff:
John R Pokras
Moody et al v. Williams et al
as 3:2017cv00516
Plaintiff:
Jesse Edward Moody, Jamaal Rackley and Joshua Miller
Defendant:
Mike Williams, Mike Bruno, T. S. Morris and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
