Cases 51 - 60 of 1,166
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv03566
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv22705
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv03556
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv22666
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Targeted Justice v. Garland
as 23-20342
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Targeted Justice, Incorporated, Winter O. Calvert, Leonid Bir and others
Defendant / Appellee:
Merrick B. Garland, Attorney General of the United States, Federal Bureau of Investigation, Christopher Wray, Director of Federal Bureau of Investigations and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv05736
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv03459
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-1529
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
In Re: Hatim Yusuf
as 23-1989
Petitioner:
HATIM YAHYA YUSUF
Respondent:
SECRETARY UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, ATTORNEY GENERAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, DIRECTOR FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-11845
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
