Cases 51 - 60 of 70
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv04558
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv04557
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
SCHWARTZ v. HOLLINGSWORTH
as 1:2015cv04601
Petitioner:
STEVEN SCHWARTZ
Respondent:
J. HOLLINGSWORTH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Schwartz v. TD Bank
as 3:2015cv00720
Plaintiff:
Steven Schwartz
Defendant:
TD Bank
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3545
Durio-Thomas et al v. Marriott International, Inc. et al
as 1:2013cv00779
Plaintiff:
Juanita Durio-Thomas and Randy Thomas
Defendant:
Marriott International, Inc. , Columbia Sussex Corporation , Columbia Sussex Management, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv01686
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
McCormack v. Joint Industry Board of the El
as 12-641
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Edward McCormack
Defendant - Appellee:
Joint Industry Board of the Electrical Industry, Gerald Finkel, Gina M. Addeo and others
Roberts et al v. The State of New York et al
as 1:2012cv00046
Plaintiff:
Maurice Bouyea, Mildred Brown, District Council 37, AFSCME, AFL-CIO and others
Defendant:
Caroline W. Ahl, Andrew M. Cuomo, Thomas P. DiNapoli and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv00045
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv08487
Debtor:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 157
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
