Cases 51 - 60 of 66
Blakley v. Bates et al
as 1:2014cv00165
Plaintiff:
Demarcus Blakley
Defendant:
Correctional Officer Bates, Correctional Officer Boyer, Richard Terry and others
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
MEBANE v. HOFFMAN et al
as 1:2014cv00309
Plaintiff:
JAMES LEE MEBANE
Defendant:
PATRICIA HOFFMAN, D.H.O. DESIGNATED HEARING OFFICER, DR. SAMPSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mebane v. Hoffman et al
as 5:2014ct03090
Plaintiff:
James Mebane
Defendant:
Patricia Hoffman, D.H.O. Designated Hearing Officer, Dr. Sampson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sherrod v. Kornegay et al
as 5:2013ct03196
Plaintiff:
Marion L. Sherrod
Defendant:
Superintendent Kornegay, Ms. Shearin and Mailroom Supervisor
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Peterson v. Lee et al
as 5:2012ct03177
Plaintiff:
Lowell Peterson
Defendant:
Gail Bailey Lee, State of North Carolina, Doctor Echard and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CLINTON v. SUMMERS et al
as 1:2012cv00792
Plaintiff:
CLINTON R. ROYSTER
Defendant:
LYNN SUMMERS, KITCHEN STAFF SUPERVISOR, SMITH, KITCHEN STAFF SUPERVISOR, ANDERSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
TOMPKINS v. MED-TECH FREEMAN
as 1:2012cv00285
Plaintiff:
JOHN C. TOMPKINS
Defendant:
MED-TECH FREEMAN, CRANFORD, VASANT DOSHI and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rydzewski v. Warden et al
as 5:2011ct03254
Plaintiff:
Bryan C. Rydzewski
Defendant:
Warden, Superintendant, Nurse Supervisor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GIDDENS v. CAMPBELL et al
as 1:2011cv00375
Plaintiff:
LEONARD W. GIDDENS, JR.
Defendant:
JOHN CAMPBELL, SUPERVISOR and DIVISION OF COMMUNITY CORRECTIONS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tompkins v. Department of Correction et al
as 5:2010ct03224
Plaintiff:
Stuart Wayne Tompkins
Defendant:
Department of Correction, J.N. Vaughan, Officer Hunt and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
