Cases 51 - 60 of 2,495
Anderson v. Department of the Interior
as 2:2023cv02439
Plaintiff:
Andre T. Anderson
Defendant:
Department of the Interior
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
McKinney v. Bowers et al
as 2:2023cv02437
Petitioner:
Charles E. McKinney
Respondent:
F. J. Bowers, C. Peters, T. D. Avery and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Champion v. Leeds
as 1:2023cv01123
Petitioner:
Dwight T. Champion
Respondent:
Chance Leeds
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Doe et al. v. Johnson City, TN et al.
as 2:2023cv00071
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe, K T and M T
Defendant:
Johnson City, TN, Karl Turner, Kevin Peters and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Cantu v. Bowers et al
as 2:2023cv02376
Petitioner:
Oziel Cantu
Respondent:
F. J. Bowers, C. Peters, T.D. Avery and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Hudson v. City of Memphis et al
as 3:2023cv00591
Plaintiff:
Mateem Malik Hudson
Defendant:
City of Memphis, Tennessee, Inc., CoreCivic Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00575
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Fisher v. Shelby County Sheriff et al
as 2:2023cv02355
Plaintiff:
Joshua Wayne Fisher
Defendant:
Shelby County Sheriff, FNU Burnett, G. Askew and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HEPACO v Robert Christopher Evance, et al
as 2:2023cv02337
Plaintiff:
HEPACO, LLC
Defendant:
Robert Christopher Evance and L&T Construction, Inc.
Fields v. Bower et al
as 2:2023cv02336
Petitioner:
Winfred Fields
Respondent:
F. J. Bower, C. Peters, T. D. Avery and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
