Cases 51 - 60 of 2,223
Coleman v. The City of Norfolk, Virginia et al
as 2:2024cv00045
Defendant:
Leandra Mae Tanner, The City of Norfolk, Virginia, Robert Foley and others
Plaintiff:
Richard Coleman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Byrd v. Hamilton et al
as 2:2024cv00034
Plaintiff:
Alphonso Byrd
Defendant:
Mr. T. Hamilton, John Does and Mr. Roberts
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rodriguez et al v. Truist Bank
as 3:2024cv00026
Plaintiff:
Gregory T Rodriguez and Kathleen J Rodriguez
Defendant:
Truist Bank
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601 Truth in Lending
Ofori v. Combs et al
as 7:2024cv00023
Plaintiff:
Terry K. Ofori
Defendant:
Mr. J. Combs, Mr. Anderson, B.L. Hughes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Peden v. Chopp et al
as 3:2024cv00023
Plaintiff:
John Quamaine Peden
Defendant:
M. Chopp and T. Woodhouse
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Anderson v. Clarke et al
as 7:2024cv00016
Plaintiff:
John David Anderson, III
Defendant:
Harold W. Clarke, Leslie J. Fleming, Beth E. Cabell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Anderson v. Clarke et al
as 2:2024cv00017
Plaintiff:
John David Anderson, III
Defendant:
Harold W. Clarke, Leslie J. Fleming, Beth E. Cabell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
C.T. v. The United States of America
as 1:2024cv00023
Plaintiff:
C T and C.T.
Defendant:
United States and The United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
Miller El v. Derosha
as 7:2024cv00011
Plaintiff:
Michael Miller El
Defendant:
T. R. Derosha
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Douglas v. Mixson et al
as 2:2024cv00008
Plaintiff:
Darren Douglas
Defendant:
W. Mixson, T. Johnson and STATEFARM Correctional Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
