Cases 51 - 60 of 104
TELEBRANDS CORP. v. DAILY SALE, INC. et al
as 2:2016cv05090
Plaintiff:
TELEBRANDS CORP.
Defendant:
DAILY SALE, INC. and JAY HOFSTATTER
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1121
Brite-Strike Technologies, Inc. v. E. MISHAN & SONS, INC.,
as 1:2016cv11672
Plaintiff:
Brite-Strike Technologies, Inc. and Telebrands Corp.
Defendant:
E. Mishan & Sons, Inc.
Counter_claimant:
E. Mishan & Sons, Inc.
Counter_defendant:
Brite-Strike Technologies, Inc. and Telebrands Corp.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1126
TELEBRANDS CORP. v. RAGNER TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION et al
as 2:2016cv03594
Plaintiff:
TELEBRANDS CORP.
Defendant:
RAGNER TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION and TRISTAR PRODUCTS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Tinnus Enterprises, LLC v. Telebrands Corp.
as 6:2016mc00021
Plaintiff:
Tinnus Enterprises, LLC
Defendant:
Telebrands Corp.
TELEBRANDS CORP. v. RAGNER TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION et al
as 2:2016cv03474
Plaintiff:
TELEBRANDS CORP.
Defendant:
RAGNER TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION and TRISTAR PRODUCTS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 145
Thinoptics, Inc. v. Ontel Products Corporation et al
as 3:2016cv01952
Plaintiff:
Thinoptics, Inc.
Defendant:
Ontel Products Corporation, World Pack USA, LLC, Telebrands Corp. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 44
TELEBRANDS CORP., v. NEWMETRO DESIGN, LLC.
as 2:2016cv01981
Plaintiff:
TELEBRANDS CORP.,
Defendant:
NEWMETRO DESIGN, LLC.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
TELEBRANDS CORP. v. ZURU LTD.
as 2:2016cv00434
Plaintiff:
TELEBRANDS CORP.
Defendant:
ZURU LTD.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
TELEBRANDS CORP v. ZURU LTD.
as 2:2015cv08675
Plaintiff:
TELEBRANDS CORP
Defendant:
ZURU LTD.
Pecial_master:
STEPHEN M. GREENBERG
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
TELEBRANDS CORP. v. RAGNER TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION et al
as 2:2015cv03163
Plaintiff:
TELEBRANDS CORP.
Defendant:
RAGNER TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION and TRISTAR PRODUCTS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
