Cases 51 - 60 of 813
Jones v. State of Texas et al
as 1:2021cv00898
Petitioner:
William Curtis Jones
Respondent:
State of Texas, Texas Department of Criminal Justice and Texas Board of Pardons and Paroles
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Padilla v. Texas Board of Pardons/Paroles
as 21-2473
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Ismael H. Padilla
Defendant / Appellee:
Texas Board of Pardons and Paroles, Texas Prison Parole Dept. and Greg Abbott, Gov. of Texas
McPherson v. Texas Board of Pardons and Paroles
as 2:2021cv00177
Petitioner:
Amario Lynn McPherson
Respondent:
Texas Board Of Pardons and Paroles
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Bey v. Texas Board of Pardons and Parole et al
as 1:2021cv00361
Plaintiff:
Knowledge Divine Bey
Defendant:
Texas Board of Pardons and Parole, Beaumont District Parole Office, Holly Champange and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Apples v. Texas Board of Pardons and Paroles
as 2:2021cv00142
Petitioner:
Alexis A Apples
Respondent:
Texas Board of Pardons and Paroles and TDCJ, Director Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Searcy v. Trochesset
as 21-40500
Defendant / Appellee:
Haley Sloss, Henry Trochesset, Joann Fentanes and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Lisa Marie Searcy
Figueroa v. Lumpkin et al
as 5:2021cv00603
Respondent:
Texas Board of Pardon and Paroles and Bobby Lumpkin
Petitioner:
Louis Angel Figueroa
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Stuart v. Lumpkin et al
as 6:2021cv00244
Defendant:
TDCJ - Parole Division, Huntsville Parole Board Panel, Bobby Lumpkin and others
Plaintiff:
Charles Lee Stuart
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Searcy v. Drug Enforcement Agency et al
as 3:2021cv00153
Defendant:
Harris County, Harris County District Clerk, Judge William Harmon and others
Plaintiff:
Lisa Marie Searcy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Searcy v. Drug Enforcement Agency et al
as 4:2021cv02069
Defendant:
Harris County, Harris County District Clerk, Judge William Harmon and others
Plaintiff:
Lisa Marie Searcy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
