Cases
Cases 51 - 60 of 869
TRADER v. UNITED STATES PAROLE COMMISSION We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2019cv04019
Petitioner: OSSIE TRADER
Respondent: UNITED STATES PAROLE COMMISSION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
LEWIS v. UNITED STATES PAROLE COMMISSION
as 2:2019cv03962
Plaintiff: KEITH L. LEWIS, JR
Defendant: UNITED STATES PAROLE COMMISSION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Robert Reed v. Warden Philadelphia FDC, et al
as 19-2926
Defendant / Appellee: CHAIRMAN UNITED STATES PAROLE COMMISSION and WARDEN PHILADELPHIA FDC
Plaintiff / Appellant: ROBERT ANDREW REED
SMITH v. UNITED STATES PAROLE COMMISSION
as 1:2019cv02389
Petitioner: JOSEPH SMITH and ELIJAH SMITH-WEEKS
Respondent: UNITED STATES PAROLE COMMISSION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
RODGERS v. MEEKS et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2019cv00207
Respondent: BOBBIE MEEKS and UNITED STATES PAROLE COMMISSION
Petitioner: MARCUS RODGERS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Warner Walden v. United States Parole Commissio
as 19-2447
Petitioner: WARNER L. WALDEN
Respondent: UNITED STATES PAROLE COMMISSION
Frederic Crafts, III v. USPC
as 19-71483
Petitioner: FREDERIC ALBERT CRAFTS III
Respondent: UNITED STATES PAROLE COMMISSION
REAVES v. UNITED STATES PAROLE COMMISSION et al
as 1:2019cv01443
Petitioner: HAROLD REAVES
Respondent: UNITED STATES PAROLE COMMISSION and DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA (C.S.C.O.A.)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Larry Budd v. Warden of FCI-Butner We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 19-6702
Petitioner / Appellant: LARRY J. BUDD
Respondent / Appellee: WARDEN OF FCI-BUTNER and UNITED STATES PAROLE COMMISSION
Mutulu Shakur v. David Shinn, et al
as 19-55503
Plaintiff / Appellant: MUTULU SHAKUR
Defendant / Appellee: FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, United States Department of Justice, DAVID SHINN, Warden and UNITED STATES PAROLE COMMISSION

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?