Cases 51 - 60 of 1,887
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv01105
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Thomas v. Perry
as 3:2023cv00372
Petitioner:
MARCUS THOMAS
Respondent:
Warden GRADY PERRY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
McCurry v. McDonough et al
as 3:2023cv00367
Plaintiff:
Agness McCurry
Defendant:
Travis McDonough, Kenny Armstrong, Andy Bennett and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Warren v. Norfolk Southern Railway Company
as 1:2023cv00230
Plaintiff:
Thomas Warren
Defendant:
Norfolk Southern Railway Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Spann et al v. Carter et al
as 3:2023cv01028
Plaintiff:
William A. Spann and Marty Spann
Defendant:
Ed Carter, Mitchell Bailey, Dale Grandstaff and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv01026
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
McCurry v. Thomas et al
as 2:2023cv00130
Plaintiff:
Agness McCurry
Defendant:
D Kelly Thomas, Joseph Ahillen, Roger Page and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv02599
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Guevara Reyes et al v. City of Memphis, Tennessee et al
as 2:2023cv02598
Plaintiff:
Salvador Guevara Reyes and Dixie Daniel Galvez Ortega
Defendant:
City of Memphis, Tennessee, Cerelyn Davis, R. Ross and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv02595
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
