Cases 51 - 60 of 216
Romero #231853 v. Ryan et al
as 2:2013cv00665
Plaintiff:
Davis Michael Romero
Defendant:
Charles L Ryan, Thomas Bell, A Greene and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
The Lincoln National Life Insurance Company v. Jacqueline Campanella Bell et al
as 2:2013cv01312
Defendant:
Carey Thomas Bell, Jacqueline Campanella Bell, Does and others
Plaintiff:
The Lincoln National Life Insurance Company
Meacham v. Ryan et al
as 2:2013cv00343
Plaintiff:
Mark Colyn Meacham
Defendant:
Charles L Ryan, Bruce McMorron, Abbe King and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bell v. Oklahoma Department of Corrections et al
as 6:2013cv00063
Plaintiff:
Joe Thomas Bell
Defendant:
Oklahoma Department of Corrections, Justin Jones, Phillip Langston and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
TwoRivers v. Ryan et al
as 2:2013cv00233
Defendant:
Charles L Ryan, S Erno, Thomas Bell and others
Plaintiff:
Christian Weaver TwoRivers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rodriguez v. Bell et al
as 2:2013cv00163
Plaintiff:
Jose J Rodriguez
Defendant:
Thomas Bell, Wexford Health Sources Incorporated and Charles L Ryan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dewayne Span v. Thomas Bell
as 13-1030
Petitioner - Appellant:
DEWAYNE SPAN
Respondent - Appellee:
THOMAS BELL, Warden
Valenzuela #172770 v. Arizona Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2012cv02734
Plaintiff:
Melinda Gabriella Valenzuela
Defendant:
Arizona Department of Corrections, Kimberly Neubauer, Janice K Brewer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Timothy Boulding v. Thomas Bell
as 12-2568
Petitioner - Appellant:
TIMOTHY JUNIUS BOULDING
Respondent - Appellee:
THOMAS BELL, Warden
Mendoza v. Ryan et al
as 2:2012cv02429
Plaintiff:
Jedidiah J Mendoza
Defendant:
Charles L Ryan, Richard Pratt, Michael Adu-Tutu and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
