Cases 51 - 60 of 282
Ray v. McFarland et al (INMATE 1)
as 3:2020cv00910
Defendant:
Corey Welch, Sgt. Wilson, John McFarland and others
Plaintiff:
Joshua Wade Ray
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JONES v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2020cv04365
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
TIMOTHY JONES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Sanchez v. Rose et al
as 3:2020cv00577
Defendant:
Dennis Homan, Sandy Rose, Harold Wickham and others
Plaintiff:
Jasmine Sanchez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JONES v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv88031
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
TIMOTHY JONES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
JONES v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv84993
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
TIMOTHY JONES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
JONES v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv77811
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
TIMOTHY JONES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
JONES v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv77492
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
TIMOTHY JONES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Timothy Jones v. M. Sandoval, et al
as 20-16452
Defendant / Appellee:
M. SANDOVAL, Correctional Officer
Defendant:
SCOTT KERNAN, Secretary of the California Department of Corrections, V. SOLIS, Associate Warden and T. FOSS, Warden
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TIMOTHY JONES
Iron Thunderhorse v. Michael Rutledge, et al
as 20-20405
Defendant / Appellee:
Chaplain Thomas Lowe, Chaplain Loretta Mitchell, Chaplain Woods and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Iron Thunderhorse
Jones v. Taskila
as 2:2020cv11993
Defendant:
Kris Taskila
Plaintiff:
Timothy Jones
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
