Cases 51 - 60 of 76
PRONIN v. CAMERON et al
as 3:2012cv00240
Petitioner:
DIMITRY PRONIN
Respondent:
KENNETH CAMERON and UNITED STATES MARSHAL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
HILL v. UNITED STATE'S MARSHALL OFFICE et al
as 2:2012cv06263
Plaintiff:
KHAIM HILL
Defendant:
UNITED STATE'S MARSHALL OFFICE and PHILA U.S. MARSHALLS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MALIKKAHN v. DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WELFARE et al
as 2:2012cv04289
Plaintiff:
ASSABUR MALIKKAHN
Defendant:
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WELFARE, FAFSA, UNITED STATES MARSHAL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
KHAN v. UNITED STATES MARSHAL
as 2:2012cv00629
Plaintiff:
AS SABUR MALIK KHAN
Defendant:
UNITED STATES MARSHAL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
MCMICKLE v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 2:2012cv00338
Plaintiff:
MATHIS MCMICKLE
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE and UNITED STATES: MARSHAL'S SERVICE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
GASSEW v. UNITED STATES MARSHALS et al
as 2:2011cv06286
Plaintiff:
JOHN GASSEW
Defendant:
UNITED STATES MARSHALS and TWO (2) JOHN DOE: MARSHALS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Keating v. United States Marshals
as 3:2011cv00151
Petitioner:
Marc Keating
Respondent:
United States Marshals and Attorney General of the United States
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
HARRIS v. UNITED STATES MARSHAL SERVICE et al
as 3:2010cv00328
Plaintiff:
DAVID O. HARRIS
Defendant:
UNITED STATES MARSHAL SERVICE and 3 UNKNOWN MARSHALS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
EFUNNUGA v. UNITED STATES MARSHALLS
as 2:2010cv06983
Plaintiff:
OLUTOKUNBO EFUNNUGA
Defendant:
UNITED STATES MARSHALLS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CARLSON v. CARMICHAEL et al
as 2:2010cv03579
Plaintiff:
ALLAN ERIC CARLSON
Defendant:
STEVE CARMICHAL, RICHARD BURKE and THREE JOHN DOE UNITED STATES MARSHALLS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
