Cases 51 - 60 of 3,832
Acevedo v. Brittain et al
as 3:2023cv00546
Plaintiff:
Alberto Acevedo
Defendant:
Kathy Brittain, A.M. Walter and N.J. Forte
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
LU v. YOUNG et al
as 2:2023cv01239
Plaintiff:
FRIEDRICH LU
Defendant:
JANE E. YOUNG, JOE H. TUCKER, JR, LESLIE MILLER GREENSPAN and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
BECKLEY et al v. BOROUGH OF SELLERSVILLE et al
as 2:2023cv01109
Plaintiff:
WALTER DOUGLAS BECKLEY and MARILYN J BECKLEY
Defendant:
BOROUGH OF SELLERSVILLE and EILEEN BRADLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
HOLLAND II v. KIJAKAZI
as 2:2023cv00787
Plaintiff:
WALTER E HOLLAND II
Defendant:
KILOLO KIJAKAZI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Clayton v. Sommer et al
as 3:2023cv00320
Plaintiff:
Johnathon Clayton
Defendant:
Diane Sommer, H. Walters, Carey Rhea and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
BROTHERHOOD MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY v. FIRST PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH OF BETHLEHEM et al
as 5:2023cv00678
Plaintiff:
BROTHERHOOD MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY
Defendant:
FIRST PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH OF BETHLEHEM, GLEN ADELSBERGER, LINDA BARTHOLOMEW and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Constitutionality of State Statute(s)
EISENHAUER v. KONINKLIJKE PHILIPS N.V. et al
as 2:2023cv00298
Plaintiff:
WALTER EISENHAUER
Defendant:
KONINKLIJKE PHILIPS N.V., PHILIPS NORTH AMERICA LLC, PHILIPS RS NORTH AMERICA LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00303
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (IMMIGRATION)
THOMAS v. OLIVER
as 1:2023cv00030
Plaintiff:
GREGORY THOMAS
Defendant:
SUPERINTENDENT L. OLIVER, DEPUTY P. THOMPSON, PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
