Cases 51 - 60 of 99,370
Teryaeva-Reed, Julia v. Warden Samantha Serrano
as 1:2024cv23564
Plaintiff:
Julia Teryaeva-Reed
Defendant:
Warden Samantha Serrano
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Ford v. Warden, Lee County Jail Core Facility
as 2:2024cv00844
Petitioner:
Tyree Ford
Respondent:
Warden, Lee County Jail Core Facility
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Dustin v. Warden, Clay County Jail
as 3:2024cv00960
Petitioner:
Danny Richard Dustin
Respondent:
Warden, Clay County Jail
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jacksonbey v. Warden, FCC Coleman - USP II
as 5:2024cv00505
Petitioner:
Haneef Shakeel Jacksonbey
Respondent:
Warden, FCC Coleman - USP II
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Whittle v. Thomas et al
as 4:2024cv00223
Defendant:
Patrick Pat Labbot, Office S. Thomas and Warden of Fulton County Jail
Plaintiff:
Israel Whittle
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
PUGH v. WALKER
as 5:2024cv00321
Defendant:
WARDEN HERBERT WALKER, III
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER LENARD PUGH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Bullock v. Warden
as 3:2024cv00768
Respondent:
Warden
Petitioner:
Corey A Bullock
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
CLAY v. WARDEN
as 3:2024cv00169
Petitioner:
DAMIAN CLAY
Respondent:
WARDEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
CONNER v. FUNDERSOL et al
as 1:2024cv01614
Defendant:
COTTON, JOANNA PRIMEAU, WINGARD and others
Plaintiff:
ROBERT CONNER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BELL v. WARDEN
as 1:2024cv09200
Respondent:
WARDEN
Petitioner:
STEPHEN JOHN BELL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
