Cases 51 - 60 of 193
Kirell Taylor v. William Sullivan
as 20-70524
Petitioner:
KIRELL FRANCIS TAYLOR
Respondent:
WILLIAM JOE SULLIVAN, Warden
Miller v. Sonus Networks, Inc. et al
as 1:2018cv12344
Defendant:
Mark T Greenquist, Raymond P. Dolan, Sonus Networks, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Ron Miller and William J. Sullivan
Petitioner:
Gary Williams, Arie Carmelli and Giuseppe Veleno
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 22
Sullivan v. APL Marine Services LTD
as 4:2020cv00178
Defendant:
APL Marine Services LTD
Plaintiff:
William A Sullivan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333
Tyrrell Burriss v. William Sullivan
as 20-55048
Respondent / Appellee:
WILLIAM JOE SULLIVAN, Warden
Petitioner / Appellant:
TYRRELL BURRISS
Bey v. Sullivan
as 1:2019cv07852
Defendant:
William B Sullivan
Plaintiff:
Zakarrhea Lisa Newbern Mazzarri Bey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Daniel Hood v. William Sullivan
as 20-70011
Respondent:
WILLIAM JOE SULLIVAN, Warden
Petitioner:
DANIEL ROGER HOOD
Joey Estrada v. William Sullivan
as 19-73199
Petitioner:
JOEY MANUEL ESTRADA
Respondent:
WILLIAM JOE SULLIVAN, Warden
Sullivan v. American President Lines, Ltd. et al
as 1:2019cv00509
Defendant:
American President Lines, LLC, Doe Government Agencies 1-20, Doe Defendants 1-20 and others
Plaintiff:
William A. Sullivan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Steven Turner, Jr. v. William Sullivan, et al
as 19-16848
Defendant / Appellee:
BUTLER, a Correctional Officer of the California Correctional Institution, individually and in their official capacities, JOHNSON, Sergeant of the California Correctional Institution, individually and in their official capacities, WILLIAM JOE SULLIVAN, Warden, Tehachapi California Correctional Institution, individually and in their official capacities and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
STEVEN DEON TURNER, Jr.
Gomez v. Sullivan
as 3:2019cv06129
Petitioner:
Elroy Pedro Gomez
Respondent:
William "Joe" Sullivan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
