Cases 51 - 60 of 63
Airbus Helicopters, Inc. v. Panalpina, Inc. et al
as 1:2017cv03325
Plaintiff:
Airbus Helicopters, Inc.
Defendant:
Panalpina, Inc. and Worldwide Flight Service Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Breach of Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv07176
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Worldwide Flight Services, Inc. v. Tame Airlines, Inc. et al
as 1:2016cv01699
Defendant:
Tame Airlines, Inc. and Tame Linea Aerea del Ecuador, Tame EP Corp.
Plaintiff:
Worldwide Flight Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
MANGAN et al v. WORLDWIDE FLIGHT SERVICES, INC. et al
as 2:2013cv06690
Plaintiff:
NEIL MANGAN and MARY MANGAN
Defendant:
WORLDWIDE FLIGHT SERVICES, INC. , CHEP AEROSPACE US INC. and CHEP (U.S.A.) INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv20642
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2008cv06078
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Josephson v. American Airlines et al
as 1:2008cv00396
Plaintiff:
Heidi Josephson
Defendant:
American Airlines, American Airlines, Inc, AMR Eagle Airlines, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2008cv01780
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2008cv02363
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
CAMPBELL et al v. OXFORD ELECTRONICS, INC.
as 2:2007cv04061
Plaintiff:
BOBBY CAMPBELL
Defendant:
OXFORD ELECTRONICS, INC.
Movant:
WORLDWIDE FLIGHT SERVICES, INC., VINCI AIRPORT U.S., INC., FORD MOTOR COMPANY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
