Cases 51 - 60 of 49,462
Kelley (PS) v. Stancil
as 1:2024cv01234
Petitioner:
Anthony Kelley
Respondent:
Andre Moses Stancil
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 st - Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Robertson (PS) v. Stancil
as 1:2024cv01203
Petitioner:
Lonnie Ray Robertson
Respondent:
Moses Stancil
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 st - Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Gordon (PS) v. U.S Parole Commission et al
as 1:2024cv01239
Petitioner:
Larry Gordon
Respondent:
U.S Parole Commission and Eric Garland
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 st - Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Daly v. Cole
as 5:2024cv00445
Petitioner:
Richard Daly
Respondent:
D. C. Cole
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Magallanes v. Laramie County District Attorney
as 2:2024cv00051
Defendant:
Laramie County District Attorney and Sylvia Hackl
Plaintiff:
Eddie Teniente Magallanes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Campbell (PS) v. No Named Respondent
as 1:2024cv01201
Petitioner:
Edward H. Campbell
Respondent:
No Named Respondent
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 st - Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Reed (PS) v. No Named Defendant
as 1:2024cv01209
Plaintiff:
LaQuann Reed
Defendant:
No Named Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Chan (PS) v. No Named Defendant
as 1:2024cv01211
Plaintiff:
Nai Lyi Chan
Defendant:
No Named Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Stancil, et al
as 24-1180
Petitioner:
DERRICK JOHNSON
Respondent:
ANDRE STANCIL, Executive Director, Colorado Department of Corrections, JENNIFER HANSEN, Warden Colorado Territorial Correction Facility and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF COLORADO
Garner v. Wilkens et al
as 1:2024cv00422
Plaintiff:
Donald Garner
Defendant:
FNU Wilkens, Jacob LNU and Alisha Tafoya
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
