Cases 61 - 70 of 139
Pierce v. Neal et al
as 3:2018cv00868
Defendant:
Superintendent Ron Neal, Jane Doe or John Doe, C Dustin and others
Plaintiff:
Mr Ronald J Pierce
Undetermined:
PENDLETON CF E-FILE (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pierce v. Warden
as 3:2018cv00857
Respondent:
Warden
Petitioner:
Ronald J Pierce
Undetermined:
PENDLETON CF E-FILE (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
PIERCE v. COOK INCORPORATED et al
as 1:2018cv02862
Plaintiff:
ALAN PIERCE
Defendant:
COOK MEDICAL LLC, COOK INCORPORATED and WILLIAM COOK EUROPE APS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
MERCADO v. PARKS et al
as 1:2018cv02860
Plaintiff:
ANGELITO C. MERCADO and ANGELITO MERCADO
Defendant:
SHELTON SGT., CHIPPER PARKS, OFFICER PIERCE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pierce et al v. Biomet Inc et al
as 3:2018cv00635
Defendant:
Biomet Orthopedics LLC, Biomet Inc and Biomet US Reconstruction LLC
Plaintiff:
Janis M Pierce and Larry T Pierce
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Pierce v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2018cv00556
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff:
Kevin Alan Pierce
Undetermined:
SSA (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
FISHEL v. STEIN et al
as 1:2018cv01702
Defendant:
ANDREW BORANS, JEREMY BROOK, ADAM COHEN and others
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL FISHEL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
FISHEL v. STEIN et al
as 1:2018cv01703
Defendant:
ALPHA EPSILON PI FRATERNITY, INC., ANDREW BORANS, JEREMY BROOK and others
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL FISHEL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity - Stockholders Suits
PIERCE v. KNIGHT
as 1:2018cv00321
Respondent:
WENDY KNIGHT
Petitioner:
KEVIN PIERCE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
RAYNE v. GANNON et al
as 1:2018cv00076
Defendant:
AMBER ALLEN, LENA ANDERSON, MEGAN ANDREWS and others
Plaintiff:
SARAH RAYNE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
