Cases filed in Michigan
Cases 61 - 70 of 134
Thurmond v. Southfield, City of et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2015cv13167
Plaintiff: Dawan Pierce Thurmond [E-Filer]
Defendant: Southfield, City of, Southfield City Attorney Office, Susan P. Ward-Witkowski and others
Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Incorporated v. orbach
as 2:2015cv12556
Plaintiff: Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Incorporated
Defendant: geoffrey ellis orbach
Cause Of Action: 27 U.S.C. § 185
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv11613
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Pierce v. USA
as 5:2015cv10975
Respondent: United States of America
Petitioner: Preston Depreice Pierce
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2014cv14491
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Pierce v. USA
as 2:2014cv13094
Respondent: United States of America
Petitioner: Keith Pierce
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Thurmond v. Langford-Morris
as 2:2014cv12701
Plaintiff: Dawan Pierce Thurmond
Defendant: Denise Langford-Morris
Pierce v. Kalamazoo County Jail et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2014cv00684
Plaintiff: Perry Pierce
Defendant: Kalamazoo County Jail and TelMate
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2014cv12173
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Pierce #F13921 v. Obama et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2014cv00543
Plaintiff: Seavon Pierce
Defendant: Barack Obama, California Department of Corrections, California Inspector General and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?