Cases 61 - 70 of 499
KING v. BRODERICK et al
as 1:2020cv02828
Defendant:
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF THE CITY OF ANDERSON, CITY OF ANDERSON and TOM BRODERICK
Plaintiff:
ANIKKA KING
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
KING v. SAUL
as 1:2020cv02758
Defendant:
ANDREW M. SAUL
Plaintiff:
DAVID L. KING
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2020cv00793
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
FREDERICK v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 3:2020cv00187
Defendant:
STATE OF INDIANA, STATE OF WASHINGTON and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Plaintiff:
GEORGE WILLIAM FREDERICK doing business as THE KINGS OF COURT BENCH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Sanders v. Indiana Department of Child Services et al
as 3:2020cv00674
Defendant:
Mery Beth Bonaventura, Indiana Department of Child Services Workers, Suntana L Anderson and others
Plaintiff:
Iredell Sanders
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
KING v. SAUL
as 4:2020cv00172
Plaintiff:
JOHN D. KING
Defendant:
ANDREW M. SAUL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
COMMON CAUSE INDIANA v. LAWSON et al
as 1:2020cv01825
Defendant:
KEVIN C. SMITH, SUZANNAH WILSON OVERHOLT, PAUL RAUSCH and others
Plaintiff:
COMMON CAUSE INDIANA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
VARHOL-KING v. COOK INCORPORATED et al
as 1:2020cv01813
Defendant:
COOK INCORPORATED, COOK MEDICAL LLC and WILLIAM COOK EUROPE APS
Plaintiff:
STEPHANIE VARHOL-KING
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
JONES v. MAYOR et al
as 1:2020cv01804
Defendant:
MAYOR, CITY OF INDIANAPOLIS, JON B KING, CHIEF, INDIANAPOLIS METROPOLITAN POLICE DEPARTMENT and others
Plaintiff:
TED BELCHER JONES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
LUNDY v. SHIVERDECKER et al
as 1:2020cv01764
Defendant:
QUINTEN SHIVERDECKER and KING REAL ESTATE, LLC
Plaintiff:
RONALD LUNDY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
