Cases 61 - 70 of 287
Martin v. Blake et al
as 1:2021cv00512
Defendant:
Jonathan M Blake, Keli M. Neary and Josh Shapiro
Plaintiff:
Ronald S. Martin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Newcleus, LLC et al v. Blake
as 2:2020cv06136
Plaintiff:
Newcleus, LLC, Integrated Financial Services of PA, Inc. d/b/a Bank Financial Services Group, Inc. and William G. Borchert
Defendant:
Mark A. Blake
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Newcleus, LLC et al v. Blake
as 2:2020cv06138
Plaintiff:
Newcleus, LLC, Integrated Financial Services of PA, Inc. d/b/a Bank Financial Services Group, Inc. and William G. Borchert
Defendant:
Mark A. Blake
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Newcleus, LLC et al v. Blake
as 2:2020cv06140
Plaintiff:
Newcleus, LLC, Integrated Financial Services of PA, Inc. d/b/a Bank Financial Services Group, Inc. and William G. Borchert
Defendant:
Mark A. Blake
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
IVY v. WETZAL et al
as 1:2020cv00265
Defendant:
DSCS ADAMS, DSFM MONGELLUZZO, DOMBROSKI and others
Plaintiff:
GLAVIN IVY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
BLAKE v. SCOTTSDALE INSURANCE COMPANY
as 2:2020cv01186
Defendant:
SCOTTSDALE INSURANCE COMPANY
Plaintiff:
JASON BLAKE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
ROBERTSON et al v. MERCK & CO., INC. et al
as 2:2020cv03473
Defendant:
MCKESSON CORP., MERCK SHARP AND DOHME CORP. and MERCK & CO., INC.
Plaintiff:
BLAKE ROBERTSON and LAURANN ROBERTSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
HOUGH et al v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2020cv03508
Plaintiff:
CALLUM WILSON, MAHEEN SHAFI, CHRISTOPHER ROMANO and others
Defendant:
DENNIS WILSON, JANE/JOHN DOES 1-100, RICHARD NICOLETTI, JR. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
BLAKE v. SAUL
as 2:2020cv02971
Defendant:
ANDREW SAUL
Plaintiff:
SUZANNE M BLAKE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
BLAKE v. MERCK & CO., INC. et al
as 2:2020cv02809
Defendant:
JANE DOE, MERCK SHARP & DOHME CORP., JOHN DOE and others
Plaintiff:
FLORA BLAKE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
