Cases 61 - 70 of 1,535
Johnson-Gruver v. Gethealth-E LLC
as 3:2022cv00251
Plaintiff:
Virginia Johnson-Gruver
Defendant:
Gethealth-E LLC
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Alexander/Ryahim v. Johnson et al
as 2:2022cv00178
Plaintiff:
Charles E Alexander/Ryahim, Jr
Defendant:
Johnson, Ramsal, Jada Lawerance and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Grissom v. Freyder et al
as 4:2022cv00874
Plaintiff:
Wesley E Grissom
Defendant:
Charlie Freyder, Joe Page and Dale Reed
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Askew v. USA
as 2:2022cv00140
Plaintiff:
William E Askew
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Orso v. Ridgell
as 2:2022mc00066
Plaintiff:
Matthew E. Orso in his capacity as successor court-appointed Receiver for Rex Venture Group LLC d/b/a ZeekRewards.com for Receiver Kenneth D. Bell
Defendant:
Dorado P. Ridgell
Garnishee:
Regions Bank, Simmons Bank and Bank of America, N.A.
Orso v. Kendrix
as 2:2022mc00065
Plaintiff:
Matthew E. Orso in his capacity as successor court-appointed Receiver for Rex Venture Group, LLC d/b/a ZeekRewards.com for Receiver Kenneth D. Bell
Defendant:
Clarise Kendrix
Garnishee:
Arvest Bank
Kesterson v. Social Security Administration
as 4:2022cv00603
Plaintiff:
Stephen E Kesterson
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Spears v. Payne et al
as 2:2022cv00116
Plaintiff:
James Spears, Jr
Defendant:
Dexter Payne, William F Straughn, Michael H Richardson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Webb v. McClung
as 3:2022cv00146
Plaintiff:
Eddie E Webb
Defendant:
Blaine McClung
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2022cv00556
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
