Cases 61 - 70 of 1,792
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv02745
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv02743
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Jones v. Loudon County, Tennessee
as 3:2023cv00415
Plaintiff:
Genny Jones
Defendant:
Loudon County, Tennessee and Officer Does 1-5
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Floyd v. Shelby County Tennessee Government et al
as 2:2023cv02729
Plaintiff:
Davey Floyd
Defendant:
Shelby County Tennessee Government, WellPath, LLC, Reginald Hubbard and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Gordon v. CoreCivic of Tennessee, LLC et al
as 3:2023cv01195
Plaintiff:
Ginger Gordon
Defendant:
CoreCivic of Tennessee, LLC, Chance Leeds, Corey Moon and others
Petitioner:
Daniel A. Horwitz
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jones v. Brun
as 3:2023cv01181
Petitioner:
Rodney Jones
Respondent:
Christopher Brun
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jones v. American Express
as 2:2023cv02717
Plaintiff:
Gregory Jermaine Jones
Defendant:
American Express
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
White et al v. Dolgencorp, LLC
as 3:2023cv01169
Plaintiff:
Daniel White, Lynette Adkins, Mary Burgess and others
Defendant:
Dolgencorp, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Barringer v. Jones
as 1:2023cv00257
Plaintiff:
Tiffany Barringer
Defendant:
Sara Jones and Sara A. Jones
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv02711
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 7703 Discrimination - Review of Agency Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
