Cases 61 - 70 of 3,348
Barnes et al v. Howmedica Osteonics et al
as 0:2024cv00185
Plaintiff:
Michael Barnes and Tamie Barnes
Defendant:
Howmedica Osteonics doing business as Stryker Orthopaedics, Stryker Corp, Stryker Sales Corporation and others
Stokes v. Ampa, Inc.
as 0:2024cv00134
Plaintiff:
Michael Stokes
Defendant:
Ampa, Inc. doing business as The Saloon
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
Rhodes v. McGee et al
as 0:2024cv00104
Plaintiff:
Thomas Rhodes
Defendant:
Michael McGee, Boyd Beccue, William Chandler and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
v. McGee et al
as 0:2024cv00103
Defendant:
Michael McGee, Boyd Beccue, William Chandler and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Roy v. Warren
as 0:2024cv00075
Plaintiff:
Michael Joseph Roy
Defendant:
Neal Aaron Warren
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Minnesota Deer Farmers Association et al v. State of Minnesota, The et al
as 0:2023cv03907
Plaintiff:
Minnesota Deer Farmers Association, Aaron Seitz, Allen Huju and others
Defendant:
State of Minnesota, The, Sarah Strommen, Erica Sawatzke and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Beck v. Barr et al
as 0:2023cv03863
Plaintiff:
Reverend Doctor Beck
Defendant:
William Pelham Barr, John G. Roberts, Lavenski R. Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Fisherman et al v. Milender et al
as 0:2023cv03836
Plaintiff:
Cory Edward Fisherman, Douglas Michael Edling, Curtis Jay French and others
Defendant:
Nathan Milender, Traci McNamara and Marray Young
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
George et al v. E.J. Mayers, Inc. et al
as 0:2023cv03797
Plaintiff:
Jason George, Timothy Gillen, Michael McNamara and others
Defendant:
E.J. Mayers, Inc. and Ernie Mayers
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1145 E.R.I.S.A.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
