Cases
Cases 61 - 67 of 67
Toms of Maine Inc. v. Acme Hardesty Co., et al
as 08-1927
Plaintiff - Appellee: TOMS OF MAINE INC.
Movant - Appellant: JONATHAN LEE RICHES
Defendant - Appellee: ACME HARDESTY CO., OHMTEMP INTERNATIONAL INC., AKZO NOBEL INC. and others
Defendant: AKZO NOBEL NV, AKZO NOBEL OLEOCHEMICALS SDN BHD, AKZO NOBEL INDUSTRIES SDN BHD, a/k/a Pacific Oleo Industries SDN BHD and others
SCHMELZLE v. UNUM LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA et al
as 3:2008cv00734
Plaintiff: THOMAS E. SCHMELZLE
Defendant: UNUM LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA and AKZO NOBEL CHEMICALS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
EDISON WETLANDS ASSOCIATION, INC. et al v. AKZO NOBEL CHEMICALS, INC. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2008cv00419
Plaintiff: EDISON WETLANDS ASSOCIATION, INC. and ROBERT SPIEGEL
Defendant: AKZO NOBEL CHEMICALS, INC., AKZO NOBEL INC. and BASELL USA, INC.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 6901 Environmental Cleanup Expenses
Korea Kumho Petrochemical Co Ltd v. Flexsys America LP et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2007cv01057
Plaintiff: Korea Kumho Petrochemical Co Ltd, Korea Kumho Petrochemical Co Ltd, Korea Kumho Petrochemical Co Ltd and others
Defendant: Flexsys America LP, Flexsys America LP, Flexsys America LP and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 15 Antitrust Litigation
Polyone Corporation et al v. Bayer AG et al
as 3:2005cv02011
Defendant: Bayer Materialscience LLC, Bayer AG, Bayer Corporation and others
Plaintiff: PolyOne Corporation and Parker Hannifin Corporation
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
AKZO NOBEL CHEMICALS V US
as 01-1491
Plaintiff-Appellant: AKZO NOBEL CHEMICALS, INC.
HOHENBERG BROS CO V US
as 01-1460
Plaintiff-Appellant: A.C. MONK AND COMPANY, INC., ADM/GROWMARK RIVER SYSTEMS, INC., AKZO NOBEL CHEMICALS, INC. and others
Defendant-Appellee: UNITED STATES

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?