Cases 61 - 70 of 308
White v. Lusk, et al
as 4:2021cv04037
Defendant:
Nevada County, AR, Miller County, Arkansas, Michael Lusk and others
Plaintiff:
Anthony Scott White
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
White v. Does
as 4:2021cv00408
Defendant:
Does Unknown guards, medical staff, inmates
Plaintiff:
Anthony Scott White
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
AVALLONE v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv21049
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY SCOTT AVALLONE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
QUEEN v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv19530
Defendant:
3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY SCOTT QUEEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
United States of America v. Conyers (Moye)
as 21-1022
Defendant:
Corey Canteen, Ramel Matthews, AKA Rah, Michael Brown, AKA Mighty and others
Defendant / Appellant:
Jason Moye, AKA Tall Jay
Appellee:
United States of America
Charter v. NIC Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv02316
Defendant:
Jayaprakash Vijayan, William M. Lyons, Pete Wilson and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Charter
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 sv
United States of America v. Conyers (Belle)
as 21-544
Defendant:
Corey Canteen, Ramel Matthews, AKA Rah, Michael Brown, AKA Mighty and others
Defendant / Appellant:
Wendell Belle, AKA Delly Dell
Appellee:
United States of America
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv01936
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Scott v. Dumbo Moving + Storage et al
as 2:2021cv01190
Defendant:
Leo "Doe", Dumbo Moving & Storage, Vladimir "Doe" and others
Plaintiff:
Anthony Scott
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv01935
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
