Cases 61 - 70 of 458
Soto et al v. Arnold
as 1:2021cv07160
Plaintiff:
Edward O Soto, Ali H. Fares and Mark D. Raposo Veras
Defendant:
James Ira Arnold
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Accardi et al v. Islamic Republic of Iran
as 1:2021cv06247
Plaintiff:
Jill Accardi, Alice V. Alexander, Theresa Allegretta and others
Defendant:
ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 2333
Bey v. Furman et al
as 1:2021cv04090
Plaintiff:
Lord Sebek Uptown Bey and Frederick Campbell
Defendant:
Mary-Elizabeth Furman, John Doe, Theresa M. Ciccotto and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv03614
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Arnold v. Toyota Material Handling, Inc.
as 5:2021cv00640
Plaintiff:
Cameron Arnold
Defendant:
Toyota Material Handling, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Finkelstein v. Kronick et al
as 7:2021cv04337
Defendant:
Fred Robinovitz, Elinor Silver, Harriet Spevack and others
Plaintiff:
Rabbi Joshua Finkelstein
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Arnold v. Lee
as 1:2021cv02096
Plaintiff:
Rosemarie Arnold
Defendant:
Patricia Lee
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
MRS Property Investments, Inc. v. Bivona et al
as 2:2021cv01104
Plaintiff:
MRS Property Investments, Inc.
Defendant:
Stephen A. Grossman, Arnold Spiegel, RJT Food and Restaurant, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Vazquez et al v. City of New York et al
as 1:2021cv01573
Defendant:
Robert Levy, Daniel Rodgers, John Doe and others
Plaintiff:
John/Jane Does and Juan M. Vazquez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Arnold v. Horton et al
as 7:2021cv01261
Defendant:
Dino Garcia, Bruce Horton and Shawn Pederson
Plaintiff:
Arlene Arnold and as Arlene Arnold
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 nr
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
