Cases 61 - 70 of 112
ARNOLD v. ELAISON et al
as 1:2015cv01084
Plaintiff:
TRAVIS DENORRIS ARNOLD
Defendant:
RUSSELL A. ELAISON, JOI ELIZABETH PEAKE, THOMAS D. SCHROEDER and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Fox v. Sharp et al
as 1:2015cv00270
Plaintiff:
Arnold Eugene Fox, Jr.
Defendant:
Eva Sharp, Chrystal McCormick, John McCormick and others
Cause Of Action: Conspiracy to Interfere with Civil Rights
Deaver v. Jones et al
as 5:2015ct03295
Plaintiff:
Tracey A. Deaver
Defendant:
Arnold O. Jones, II, Sandra F. Meyer and Charles Gurley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ARNOLD v. ELIASON et al
as 1:2015cv00498
Plaintiff:
TRAVIS DENORRIS ARNOLD
Defendant:
RUSSELL A. ELIASON, THOMAS D. SCHROEDER, COMBS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ARNOLD v. COMBS et al
as 1:2015cv00499
Plaintiff:
TRAVIS DENORRIS ARNOLD
Defendant:
COMBS, THOMAS D. SCHROEDER, RUSSELL A. ELIASON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Allen et al v. Brock and Scott, PLLC et al
as 3:2015cv00038
Plaintiff:
Toye W. Allen and Arnold Tyler
Defendant:
Brock and Scott, PLLC, Trustee Services of Carolina, LLC, U.S. Bank National Association and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Steele v. Mobley et al
as 5:2014ct03298
Plaintiff:
Henry J. Steele
Defendant:
Arnold Mobley, Clarence Lee Faulcon and Caroline Taylor
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pride v. Miller et al
as 5:2014cv00781
Defendant:
Matt Miller , Travis R. Sparks , Aaron Cantwell and others
Plaintiff:
Phillip D. Pride
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Hodges v. Arnold
as 2:2014cv00058
Plaintiff:
Billy Rex Hodges
Defendant:
Christopher Arnold
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Jemsek v. North Carolina et al
as 5:2014cv00504
Plaintiff:
Joseph Jemsek
Defendant:
State of North Carolina , North Carolina Medical Board , Janelle R Rhyne and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
