Cases 61 - 70 of 181
Ashely v. Youngblood et al
as 1:2016cv01638
Defendant:
Donny Youngblood , Mick Gleason , Zack Scrivner and others
Plaintiff:
Mark Ashely
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2
Center For Biological Diversity et al v. Fish and Wildlife Services of the United States et al
as 4:2016cv06040
Plaintiff:
Center For Biological Diversity , Environmental Protection Information Center , Klamath-Siskiyou Wildlands Center and others
Defendant:
U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service , Sally Jewell and Daniel M. Ashe
Cause Of Action: 16 U.S.C. § 1538
LJ Properties, Inc. v. Stanley Ash et al
as 2:2016cv07362
Defendant:
Stanley Ash and DOES
Plaintiff:
LJ Properties, Inc.
Ashe v. Portfolio Recovery Associates, LLC
as 3:2016cv01848
Plaintiff:
John Ashe
Defendant:
Portfolio Recovery Associates, LLC
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 0227
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv05356
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Giovanni T. Gladden v. County of Riverside et al
as 5:2016cv01541
Defendant:
Marion Ashely, John Benoit, County of Riverside and others
Plaintiff:
Giovanni T. Gladden
Thomas E. Carpenter v. Carter Ash et al
as 5:2016cv00524
Defendant:
Honorable Carter Ash, Honorable Robert A. McDonald, Honorable John M. McHugh and others
Plaintiff:
Thomas E. Carpenter
Espinoza v. California Highway Patrol et al
as 1:2016cv00193
Plaintiff:
Ernest J. Espinoza
Defendant:
California Highway Patrol, State of California, City of Bakersfield and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ashe v. Colvin
as 5:2015cv06047
Plaintiff:
Julie Ashe
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Center for Biological Diversity et al v. U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service et al
as 3:2015cv05754
Plaintiff:
Center for Biological Diversity and Environmental Protection Information Center
Defendant:
U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service, Sally Jewell and Daniel M. Ashe
Cause Of Action: 16 U.S.C. § 1538
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
