Cases 61 - 70 of 568
Vicena v. Saul
as 1:2019cv03379
Plaintiff:
Laura Vicena
Defendant:
Acting Commissioner Nancy A. Berryhill and Andrew Marshall Saul
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Williams v. Saul
as 1:2019cv03165
Defendant:
Acting Commissioner Nancy A. Berryhill and Andrew Marshall Saul
Plaintiff:
Robert M. Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Jester v. Saul
as 2:2019cv00793
Defendant:
Acting Commissioner Nancy A. Berryhill and Andrew M Saul
Plaintiff:
Bennett Jester
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv03053
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Stevenson v. Berryhill
as 1:2019cv11202
Defendant:
Acting Commissioner Nancy A. Berryhill
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Plaintiff:
Alisa Michelle Stevenson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416
Greer v. Saul
as 1:2019cv02838
Defendant:
Acting Commissioner Nancy A. Berryhill and Andrew Marshall Saul
Plaintiff:
Michael Greer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416
Scheibelhut v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2019cv00209
Defendant:
Acting Commissioner NANCY A. BERRYHILL and Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff:
KENNETH R SCHEIBELHUT
Not Yet Classified:
SSA (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Pelka v. Saul
as 1:2019cv03107
Defendant:
Acting Commissioner Nancy A. Berryhill and Andrew Marshall Saul
Plaintiff:
Harry A Pelka
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416
Sibert v. Saul
as 1:2019cv02837
Plaintiff:
Jeremy A Sibert and Jeremy Alan Sibert, Sr.
Defendant:
Acting Commissioner Nancy A. Berryhill and Andrew Marshall Saul
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416
Mercado v. Berryhill et al
as 1:2019cv11172
Defendant:
Acting Commissioner Nancy A. Berryhill and Andrew M. Saul
Not Yet Classified:
U.S. Attorney Massachusetts and Attorney General USA
Plaintiff:
Santiago Rosario Mercado
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
