Cases 61 - 70 of 794
McClendon v. Adams
as 4:2023cv00546
Petitioner:
Corey B. McClendon
Respondent:
Richard Adams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Huffman v. Adams
as 4:2023cv00446
Petitioner:
Phillip A. Huffman
Respondent:
Richard Adams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jones v. City of Lake Ozark, Missouri et al
as 2:2023cv04081
Plaintiff:
Channer Jones
Defendant:
City of Lake Ozark, Missouri, Kelly Lowe, Adam Khachi and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv00364
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Schumer v. Jereda et al
as 2:2023cv04061
Plaintiff:
Tyler Raphael Schumer
Defendant:
Justin K Jereda, Schaeffer, Adam Roberts and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Taegel v. Prudential Insurance Company of America
as 4:2023cv00185
Plaintiff:
Adam Taegel
Defendant:
Prudential Insurance Company of America
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Gilley v. Precythe et al
as 6:2023cv03073
Petitioner:
Joshua R Gilley
Respondent:
Anne L. Precythe, Richard Adams and Eric Schmidt
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Blair et al v. Boyer et al
as 4:2023cv00189
Plaintiff:
Diamond-Donnell D. Blair and William C. Blair
Defendant:
Brian Boyer, Anne Precythe, Jeff Norman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Taylor v. Adams et al
as 4:2023cv00139
Plaintiff:
Leonard Taylor
Defendant:
Richard Adams and Ann Precythe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Buckner v. Shaffer et al
as 2:2023cv00004
Plaintiff:
Earnest L. Buckner
Defendant:
A. Shaffer, M. Golain, D. Austin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
