Cases 61 - 70 of 602
Anderson v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2022cv00404
Plaintiff:
Dustin R Anderson
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Not Classified By Court:
SSA (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (RSI)
ANDERSON v. SEVIER
as 1:2022cv01994
Petitioner:
DARRYL ANDERSON
Respondent:
SEVIER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Anderson v. Huntsman et al
as 2:2022cv00288
Plaintiff:
Micah Anderson
Defendant:
Peter R Huntsman and Hub Inc
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv01819
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
ANDERSON, JR. v. RICHEY
as 1:2022cv01854
Plaintiff:
KEITH ANDERSON, JR.
Defendant:
ALISHA RICHEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ANDERSON v. MONNETT et al
as 2:2022cv00474
Plaintiff:
QUAYLAN K'WON ANDERSON
Defendant:
MONNETT, ARNETT and FBOP TERRE HAUTE, IN USP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
POTTER v. INDIANAPOLIS METROPOLITAN POLICE DEPARTMENT et al
as 1:2022cv01785
Plaintiff:
CLARENCE POTTER
Defendant:
INDIANAPOLIS METROPOLITAN POLICE DEPARTMENT, RANDAL TAYLOR, MARION COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
ANDERSON v. STILLABOWER
as 1:2022cv01731
Plaintiff:
MARK ANDERSON
Defendant:
TYLER STILLABOWER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ANDERSON v. LNU
as 2:2022cv00349
Plaintiff:
QUAYLAN ANDERSON
Defendant:
FNU LNU
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ANDERSON v. CARTER et al
as 1:2022cv01792
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH L. ANDERSON, JR.
Defendant:
ROBERT CARTER, JR., DENNIS REAGLE and DR. CHRISTINE LIEDTKE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
