Cases 61 - 70 of 82
USA v. Miguel Cruz-Polanco
as 11-5598
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
MIGUEL ANGEL CRUZ-POLANCO
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2011cv01157
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rivera-Crespo v. Molina-Rodriguez
as 3:2011cv01041
Plaintiff:
Luis A. Rivera-Crespo
Defendant:
Carlos Molina-Rodriguez , Jorge O. Mojica-Vega , Victor Rivera-Percy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2010cv01931
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Cruz Orea et al v. Saleshi Corp. et al
as 1:2010cv08130
Plaintiff:
Miguel Angel Cruz Orea and Marco Antonio Metodio Carmona
Defendant:
Saleshi Corp., Francis Sagi and John Does #1-10
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Cruz v. SOUTHWINDS EXPRESS CONSTRUCTION, LLC et al
as 2:2010cv02816
Plaintiff:
Angel Cruz
Defendant:
SOUTHWINDS EXPRESS CONSTRUCTION, LLC, CENTRAL ROCK CORPORATION and Michael Flaherty
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2
Cruz-Rosado v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2010cv01591
Plaintiff:
Angel Cruz-Rosado
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Cruz-Soto v. Villanueva et al
as 3:2010cv01466
Plaintiff:
Miguel Angel Cruz-Soto
Defendant:
Villanueva and Colon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rodriguez v. M.I. Quality Lawn Maintenance, Inc. et al
as 1:2010cv21031
Plaintiff:
Jose Angel Cruz Rodriguez
Defendant:
M.I. Quality Lawn Maintenance, Inc., Mitchell's lawn Maintenance Corp. and Mitchell Igelko
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Jiminez Pinto de Saldana et al v. Solis et al
as 1:2009cv00168
Plaintiff:
Daisy Y Jiminez Pinto de Saldana, Miguel Angel Cruz Parilla and Maria de la Luz Hernandez Martinez
Defendant:
Manuel E. Solis, Jessica Y Prado and Manuel E. Solis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Tort Action
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
