Cases
Cases 61 - 70 of 108
Ball et al v. McKesson Corporation et al
as CAN/4:13-cv-03053
Plaintiff: Melissa Ball , Zeddra Bayley , Ruby Crotts and others
Defendant: McKesson Corporation and SmithKline Beecham Corporation
Wagner v. Smith We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2013cv00112
Petitioner: Lyle M. Wagner
Respondent: Arthur Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Smith v. Keryx Biopharmaceuticals, Inc et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2013cv00755
Plaintiff: Arthur Smith
Defendant: Keryx Biopharmaceuticals, Inc and Ron Bentsur
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78 m(a) Securities Exchange Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2013cv00211
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Anderson v. Smith et al
as 4:2012cv00115
Plaintiff: Reginald Anderson
Defendant: Arthur Smith, Alfonzo Ricks, Francesca Foremon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
USA v. Arthur Smith We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 12-15584
Plaintiff - Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant: ARTHUR SMITH, a.k.a. Co-Chief
Smith v. Alvarez
as 3:2012cv03284
Plaintiff: Arthur Smith
Defendant: Anita Alvarez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Smith v. Alvarez
as 1:2012cv08472
Plaintiff: Arthur Smith
Defendant: Anita Alvarez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Arrington v. Smith et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2013cv01080
Plaintiff: Thermon Arrington
Defendant: Arthur Smith and Attorney General of the State of Mississippi
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Arrington v. Smith et al
as 4:2012cv00156
Plaintiff: Thermon Arrington
Defendant: Arthur Smith and Attorney General of the State of Mississippi
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?