Cases 61 - 70 of 130
Miller v. Attorney General State of West Virginia et al
as 3:2016cv04225
Plaintiff:
Teresa Miller
Defendant:
Attorney General State of West Virginia, Bird Song, Meed and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Miller v. Attorney General State of West Virginia et al
as 1:2016cv00082
Plaintiff:
Teresa Miller
Defendant:
Attorney General State of West Virginia, Bird Song, Meed or Meek and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv00066
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv00044
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Burman v. Attorney General
as 5:2016cv00014
Plaintiff:
Allah Burman
Defendant:
Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Osborne v. U. S. Attorney et al
as 2:2015cv15341
Plaintiff:
Ajamu Osborne
Defendant:
U. S. Attorney, Monica Coleman, M-DENT CEO and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Rivadeneira v. Department of Homeland Security (D.H.S.) et al
as 5:2015cv00092
Plaintiff:
Felix Guzman Rivadeneira
Defendant:
Department of Homeland Security (D.H.S.), Department of Immigration Customs Enforcement (I.C.E.), United States Attorney General and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Dismas Charities et al
as 2:2015cv10749
Petitioner:
James Smith
Respondent:
Dismas Charities and U. S. Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Farris v. Dismas Charities et al
as 2:2015cv10753
Petitioner:
Thomas Farris
Respondent:
Dismas Charities and United States Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Warren v. Crook et al
as 5:2015cv00088
Petitioner:
Paul W. Warren
Respondent:
Steven M. Crook, Marion County Circuit Court, Judge Janes and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
