Cases 61 - 70 of 147
Engel v. State of New York Attorney General
as 3:2017cv05148
Plaintiff:
Noel J. P. Engel
Defendant:
State of New York Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
Engel v. Missouri Attorney General
as 3:2017cv05152
Plaintiff:
Noel J. P. Engel
Defendant:
Missouri Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2017cv03179
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 7703
Parker v. Shartle
as 4:2017cv00362
Petitioner:
Kenneth D. Parker
Respondent:
JT Shartle and Attorney General of the State of MissourI
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Bey v. United States Government Corporation et al
as 4:2016cv02111
Plaintiff:
Maurese Bey
Defendant:
United States Government Corporation, John Kerry, Hillary Clinton and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Newport v. Northwest Missouri Psychiatric Rehabilitation Center et al
as 5:2016cv06059
Plaintiff:
Scott Eugene Newport
Defendant:
Bruce Parsa, Judy Hadley and Jason Crabb
Interested_party:
Missouri Attorney General's Office
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ebeck v. USA
as 6:2016cv03032
Plaintiff:
Gary Ebeck
Defendant:
United States of America Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
Heckman v. United States of America Attorney General et al
as 5:2015cv06152
Plaintiff:
Thomas J Heckman
Defendant:
United States of America Attorney General and Internal Revenue Service of the United States of America
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 6532
United States of America v. Cazzell et al
as 5:2015cv06127
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Faye Cazzell, John Cazzell, Portfolio Recovery Associates, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7403
State of Missouri Attorney General v. Vilsack
as 5:2015cv06086
Plaintiff:
State of Missouri Attorney General
Defendant:
Tom Vilsack
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
