Cases 61 - 70 of 339
PASTORIES v. SMITH et al
as 2:2021cv00737
Respondent:
BARRY SMITH and THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF ALLEGHENY COUNTY
Petitioner:
ADAM PASTORIES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
SPADA v. PENNSYLVANIA BOARD OF PROBATION AND PAROLE et al
as 1:2021cv00158
Respondent:
PENNSYLVANIA BOARD OF PROBATION AND PAROLE and BARRY SMITH
Petitioner:
ZACHARY THOMAS SPADA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
PASTORIES v. SMITH et al
as 2:2021cv00708
Respondent:
THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF ALLEGHENY, BARRY SMITH and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Petitioner:
ADAM PASTORIES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
BUCKLEY v. SMITH et al
as 2:2021cv02405
Respondent:
BARRY SMITH and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Petitioner:
MICHAEL BUCKLEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Polanco-Cano v. Smith et al
as 2:2021cv02153
Respondent:
BARRY SMITH and PENNSYLVANIA ATTORNEY GENERAL'S OFFICE
Petitioner:
Israel Polanco-Cano
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Davis v. Pennsylvania Department of Corrections et al
as 4:2021cv00826
Defendant:
E. Miller, Joel Barrows, John Wetzel and others
Plaintiff:
Keith Vernon Davis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PITTMAN v. SMITH
as 3:2021cv00083
Respondent:
BARRY SMITH
Petitioner:
GABRIEL ISHAM PITTMAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Aina v. The Commonwealth of Pennsylvania et al
as 4:2021cv00794
Defendant:
Trooper Luke Straniere, C.O. Baughman, Jason A. Lambrino and others
Plaintiff:
Andre Yanick Aina
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CHISOM v. SMITH et al
as 1:2021cv00773
Petitioner:
Dondre M. Chisom
Respondent:
Barry Smith and The Attorney General Of the State of Pennsylvania
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
CHISOM v. SMITH et al
as 2:2021cv01612
Petitioner:
DONDRE M. CHISOM
Respondent:
BARRY SMITH and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
