Cases 61 - 70 of 237
Culp v. Gentry et al
as 4:2022cv04081
Plaintiff:
Cody Culp
Defendant:
Robert Gentry, Arenar Romona, Deputy Chris Walcott and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
West v. Gentry et al
as 4:2022cv04079
Plaintiff:
Braeden West
Defendant:
Robert Gentry, Arenar Romona, Deputy Chris Walcott and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Emfinger v. Gentry et al
as 4:2022cv04091
Plaintiff:
David Emfinger
Defendant:
Robert Gentry, Arenar Romona, Deputy Chris Walcott and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mahaffey v. Gentry et al
as 4:2022cv04080
Plaintiff:
Kent Mahaffey
Defendant:
Robert Gentry, Arenar Romona, Deputy Chris Walcott and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Robertson et al v. Payne et al
as 4:2022cv00796
Plaintiff:
Bobby Lee Robertson
Defendant:
Dexter Payne, Dale Reed, William Straughn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2022cv00735
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Chism v. Payne et al
as 4:2022cv00730
Plaintiff:
Nathan Harold Chism
Defendant:
Dexter Payne, Marshal Dale Reed, Jennifer Carl and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sherrard v. Southern Caregivers, Ltd. et al
as 1:2022cv01043
Plaintiff:
Lennie Sherrard
Defendant:
Southern Caregivers, Ltd. and Blake Watson
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Luna v. Gentry et al
as 4:2022cv04048
Plaintiff:
Ronnie Anthony Luna
Defendant:
Robert Gentry, Deputy Chris Walcott, Adrian Hernandez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Steffler v. Gentry et al
as 4:2022cv04045
Plaintiff:
Micah Alan Steffler
Defendant:
Sheriff Robert Gentry, Jailer Blake Reel, Jailer Anna Mejia and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
