Cases 61 - 70 of 72
Nazir v. Baylor College Of Medicine
as 4:2010cv03980
Defendant:
Baylor College Of Medicine and John Does 1 - 25
Plaintiff:
Talat Nazir
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2003
Baylor College Of Medicine v. AMBAC Financial Group, Inc. et al
as 4:2009cv03678
Plaintiff:
Baylor College Of Medicine
Defendant:
AMBAC Financial Group, Inc. and AMBAC Assurance Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Blackstock et al v. Slawin et al
as 4:2009cv01595
Plaintiff:
Roger Brent Blackstock and Melanie Russell Blackstock
Defendant:
Kevin Slawin, Baylor College of Medicine and Greater Houston Anesthesiology, P.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Medical Malpractice
Miller v. Baylor College of Medicine Federal Credit Union et al
as 4:2009cv01332
Plaintiff:
Billy T Miller
Defendant:
Baylor College of Medicine Federal Credit Union, Baylor College Of Medicine and Two Unknown Houston Police Officers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
CONLAY v. BAYLOR COLLEGE OF MEDICINE
as 2:2009mc00033
Plaintiff:
LYDIA CONLAY
Defendant:
BAYLOR COLLEGE OF MEDICINE
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Conlay v. Baylor College of Medicine
as 1:2009mc10069
Plaintiff:
Lydia Conlay and Lydia Conlay
Defendant:
Baylor College of Medicine
Kieback v. Baylor College of Medicine et al
as 4:2008cv03291
Plaintiff:
Dirk Kieback and Dirk Kieback
Defendant:
Baylor College of Medicine, Matthew Anderson, Margit Maria Janat-Amsbury and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2008cv03080
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2008cv01038
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2008cv01028
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
